Weblog

Thursday, 21 May 2009

  • Animal Rights eliminating choices

     Tucker12007

    They claim they don't want to bother "responsible breeders". They claim they don't want to eliminate choice but that's exactly what is being demanded. Animal rights activists are calling the breeders of Biden and Obama's dogs "puppy mills" - despite zero proof of the allegations of previous descriptions of puppy mills. All breeders are puppy mills. They claim they're about choice but DEMAND no choice even among our leaders. People don't have the right to change their mind? One site says even Simon Cowell said in an interview he hopes the Obamas adopt and will gladly pay for the dog's food.

    Here's a thought - why doesn't Simon Cowell get a dog?!! With millions in royalties the Obamas can't afford dog food?!

    They show bad rescues too, and rescues are infamous for not 'adopting' to those with young children - indeed many have been turned down for dogs because they have children. THAT is why dogs are put to sleep. Additionally many will not adopt if there's another pet in the home, or if there's a temporary residence. Does the Obama family plan to live in the White House forever? Others planning to move in a couple years would be denied in that it might not be a permanent home. One is complaining that people are asking for Portuguese Water dogs - hmm...with so many purebreds of all breeds aren't those HOMES for available rescued PWD?! Can shelters and rescue not work together for the good of the dog?

    Let's not forget the thousands of dogs - mutts - imported from other countries into some shelters. Unknown health unknown background but hey it's a breathing dog it's a great pet. I have nothing against mutts - have several myself.

    They claim that if Obama adopts it will create a demand for shelter dogs. Demand does NOTHING when the homes are denied! For years people *have* gone to shelters and rescues and the list of reasons to deny dogs a home is staggering - and justified!

    For example  - go to yahoo and type in "shelter dog adoption" - one of the top is shelterdogs.com - from Sacramento. You cannot get information about dogs without visiting the shelter - so that eliminates 99.98% of homes right there. How about the Anderson Animal Shelter in IL - for $200 if you meet the requirements and have the landlord's permission and weed out the ones with no kids ad no dogs - and consider allergies in the family...maybe 11 to choose from.

    Or there's Franklin County Ohio - which you must bring all family members, children and other pets before even considering getting a dog...along with present dogs' vet records (they can't tell looking at the dog if it's in good condition and receiving good care), a copy of th elease showing dogs are allowed, wallet and photo ID and like many now has disclaimers of possible temperament problems that may or may not show up.

    Now here's a thought - they have a dog that was a gift and apparently fits well. There's a known background and predictable response based on breed and background. They get a shelter dog by demand and it bites someone - how much will other shelter dogs get a chance for a home then? How many good dogs will be condemned by the actions of one very public one? Even no kill shelters have been killing dogs - and many support killing and do not want to end killing pets.

    Additionally most of the time I call about a dog posted on some online website I'm told the dog was adopted - so there *is* a demand for these dogs and they *are* being moved.

    A dog is a personal choice. Most of these places are dead set againt giving a dog at Christmas because it's a personal choice but want the public to demand something they don't do. How about each person who signs the petition go and get a dog from the shelter - it'd empty the cages at last! And even with that there would still be dogs killed. Places like Detroit and Jasper AL that kill all "pitbulls" because they might be fought - without any chance of getting a home.

    There's many who don't have a fenced yard which eliminates many homes. One of the first things asked is why do you want a dog. What do they say...hmmm "because the American people don't like our choice of a dog and insist we need another?"

    How much time will two dogs get while the Obamas are jetsetting around the world?

    And one more thing - does everyone protesting keep every promise and uphold every statement they say? Clearly from shelters the answer is no. If their main goal was getting the dogs in homes to prevent killing them then it would happen...when a dog is denied a home that wants them that is not getting the dog a home.

     

Monday, 18 May 2009

  • NAIS

    I wanted to post this here for the very reason that illustrates why NAIS should not be passed and why the government doesn't need in our business...go to the site to comment and it will not accept the comments! Now--if NAIS was in effect and I had a horse that needed to go to a vet - do I load and go for the welfare of the horse and risk fines for not reporting it...or do I persist trying to get a form to go through that will not be accepted on a government site? And consumers - this affects your food supply! If you want a choice, if you want reasonably priced alternatives to buying at the store, if you want to raise it yourself or even if you use a raw meat/BARF diet for the dogs it's time to stand with farmers on this before your choice is removed.

    >> I cannot make it to the meeting in Birmingham but want to voice my objection to NAIS. This will not help food safety but can decrease food safety. My personal food safety.

    It is claimed that it will decrease recalls - but the meat recalls that have happened were due to things in processing, NOT at the farm. There is widely varying stories as to the costs of tags, readers and other things. Requiring veterinarians to implement it puts the costs through the roof for small animals. Further in the case of rabbits, poultry and other small animals tags are not possible. Rabbits have tattoos in the ear but a tag detracts from the ability to show which would put a serious dent if not halt the breeding and exhibition of purebred rabbits, some which are in existance because of shows. It can be a death blow to the rare livestock which are already small in numbers.

    Poultry cannot safely be tagged. It's said that some poultry and small livestock could be microchipped, with some reports that microchipping pets has a higher rate of cancer. So if I microchip each of 50 chickens (even if it was affordable) and that microchip is a source of contamintion it is not the public affected - those birds are for my freezer. If a litter of bunnies has 10 at birth but only 7 make it to weaning it becomes a nightmare to report it for those with even a small rabbitry of 20 does.

    These are not commercial enterprises. The risk to the public health is zero - whether NAIS is in place or not because I am not selling. NAIS is intrustive and unfairly implemented. We can already trace animals - if and when I sign up to purchase anything at a sale barn drivers license info is taken - thus if there was a massive outbreak involving animals from the sale the sale barn already knows who bought what and where it went based on existing records.

    Small producers do not eye the export market - no chance of contaminating other countries there. The large corporations who do get a pass on tagging and the standards small producers must meet.

    Additionally it violates the right to privacy and the constitutional right to search and seizure. It allows unfair harassment of small farmers by the competition - large corporate places that have a place in volume production but not necessarily in the quality. The narrow genetic base of many large herds leave those more open to problems but with fewer restrictions. Additionally with the growing harassment from animal rights groups and the insecurity of information within the government it leaves an opening for harassment and even arson, assault and vandalism of private property that the governent cannot prevent and will not protect from. There is no reason the government needs to know how many rabbits or ducks or whatever someone has.

    Much disease is spread through migration - which is not something livestck do. The "governments herds" of deer, elk and other animals are also exempt from legislation requirements. This is a point of possible contamination due to movement that is much more at risk than animals confined to one place.

    The forced sign up in some states such as IL where one HAS to sign up in order to show at the county or state fair is a tactic that does nothing to assure that this is anything but what is presented - the government forcing their way into our homes and farms.

    Many of our US livestock breeds are endangered, with under 1,000 left. This would mean extinction for them - animals that may well be needed desperately if outbreaks or problems happen in the commercial places. On one hand there's laws to eliminate large farms (such as the cage ban in CA) but on the other there's NAIS pushing to eliminate the alternative. A taste test by chefs and experts showed overwhelmingly the rare breeds were favored above the commercial breeds in turkeys, beef and pork. Those behind NAIS and the USDA want to throw that out and force what some see as inferior food to begin with by eliminating the ability to do anything else.

    The vast majority of people are against this, have been against it and still things are slipped in and the USDA is going ahead while pretending to listen. There is no excuse for ignoring those involved. The only ones I've heard speak in favor of it are those who stand to profit from it. By reducing competition we have no choice in our then weakened and compromised food supply. By requiring this it puts billions of dollars in the hands of corporations selling tags and readers and TAKES it from the small rural places already hit by the economy and the people raising their own food BECAUSE of the economy.

    hornedblackcow KendallCoFairyounghen

    Are these a public health risk worth eliminating? Neither of these will be found in commercial herds - the cow has horns and the chicken is not a commercial white bird.

     

Wednesday, 08 April 2009

  • Mr Ornery 7/04 - 4/09

    MrOrnerylounging He's been a dominant mark in a "not a cat" household for almost 5 years. So much so he appeard in the book video.

    I suspected a couple months ago he came back to say goodbye. Mr. was an independent sort - a maverick who was not a normal cat. From kittenhood he had more dog mannerisms but in a cat's body. In Peoria we wanted a cat but not just any cat would do; had to be the right cat. In a multiple dog household a shy or scared cat would be terrorized. I was in the pet store one day and noticed kittens being given away; as I checked out there was one left. As I debated someone walked in with a Pyr and this little mite took one look at that dog and swelled up like he was gonna kick the dog's butt. I said THAT is the cat that can hold his own and took him home. He let Jim (border collie) carry him around by the head until Mr got too big. He'd take on a dog if necessary and wouldn't hesitate to smack them. He preferred being an indoor/outdoor which we didn't like due to the busy street and his penchant for going across the street to sit on the sidewalk and see how big of a meltdown he could cause from the pitbulls over there.

    He went with me in the disastrous move to GA then here to AL. By then he preferred outside and after we moved here it's as if he knew it was settled...he'd take off for a while then come back for a few meals, a visit and showing off his war wounds - a missing toe. We tried keeping him in but he'd always manage to find an opening and was out again. He came back in January and looked ragged. A trip to the vet and he was wormed, mites in his ears treated and pronounced ready to slick up and be a big cat again. He never did really come back and fleas started. I'd given him a bath and dipped him trying to relieve the fleas but he died overnight. He'd had bouts of diarrhea but the vet clinic didn't seem concerned when I called to question why it hadn't gone away; nor about the occasional discharge from his eyes or congestion.

    Mr wasn't one to get excited about "here kitty kitty" - he hated to be cuddled but loved sitting between my feet as I worked. He liked contact especially as he got older, but it was on his terms, jumping up on a counter.We'd developed a little thing of silent meows where he'd meow but it was more a whisper or silent and I'd do the same to him...he'd walk over and brush up against me. He'd catch food like a dog but used his cat skills to get up and open the cupboards. He outlived everyone from the move south except Bruiser and MissKitty who looks to be pregnant. He'll be buried near Jim - those two had an unusual friendship. He'll be missed.  

    Mrsnooze

    photo taken last weekend.

     

  • Horse racing

    It's the time of year to get wrapped up in Derby fever and the scent of roses as the Kentucky Derby is less than a month away. Yesterday I came across something about an older star. He's 30 this month.

    www.pickingtheponies.com/janhoadley has more

Saturday, 04 April 2009

JanH1961

  • Visit JanH1961's Xanga Site
    • Name: Jan
    • Country: United States
    • State: Alabama
    • Metro: Florence
    • Birthday: 11/11/1961
    • Gender: Female
    • Member Since: 5/11/2004

Other Things

LINKS: Successful Farming BloodHorse Jeff Bates cmt Jeff Bates items Progressive Farmer almanac The "family" - Paul - significant other border collies - Bruiser (5/1997 - 1/2 heeler), Scout (9/2002); Freckles and Fly (5/2003), (10/2004), Jim (2/2002). Gael and Luke are parents of Scout, Freckles, Fly; Bruiser is also Gael's son; Freckles 'kids' Snafu, Missy (12/05). Hatter (fox terrier 10/06), Laddie (sheltie 12/06), Bella (German Shepherd 10/06), Remington (walker hound ??2004??); Honey (mutt 12/06); Red (redbone coonhound ?12/05); Tucker (mutt?2003?); foster dog Frankie (yellow lab, 2005), 3 littermates to Honey; part time dog Blue (cattle dogX ??age - mother to Honey and others). kitties - Mr Ornery (9/2003), Miss Kitty (???), Psycho, ShyBoy, Stripe(7/2005), Boots & Ghost Lacy - Thoroughbred. And at the Rainbow Bridge: Border collies: Gael (6/1995 - 12/06), Packy (12/03 - 11/06), Luke (11/00 - 10/06), Jerry, Jake, Duke, Ina, Lika, Lil Girl & Jessie, Terra, Jr., Taz & Tillie, Jess, Spot & Craig; Horses: Little Joe, Sunny, Seek The Stars, Sierra, Paycheck's Sissy, Starlight Commander, Chief. Not mine but much missed - TBs Nephew, Five Star, Firing Point, Gator, Fiery Finish

About Me

  • Hi - I grew up on an Illinois farm and have lived in several other places across America. I enjoy border collies, Thoroughbred (and other!) horses, music, farming, writing and much more. One of the most endangered communities in America is the farming community, which most look the other way or encourage the demise of by paving over more farm land. Vote with your fork...give the family farms a chance to survive. http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/15473/jan_hoadley.html or www.writenowbiz.com