I wanted to post this here for the very reason that illustrates why NAIS should not be passed and why the government doesn't need in our business...go to the site to comment and it will not accept the comments! Now--if NAIS was in effect and I had a horse that needed to go to a vet - do I load and go for the welfare of the horse and risk fines for not reporting it...or do I persist trying to get a form to go through that will not be accepted on a government site? And consumers - this affects your food supply! If you want a choice, if you want reasonably priced alternatives to buying at the store, if you want to raise it yourself or even if you use a raw meat/BARF diet for the dogs it's time to stand with farmers on this before your choice is removed.
>> I cannot make it to the meeting in Birmingham but want to voice my objection to NAIS. This will not help food safety but can decrease food safety. My personal food safety.
It is claimed that it will decrease recalls - but the meat recalls that have happened were due to things in processing, NOT at the farm. There is widely varying stories as to the costs of tags, readers and other things. Requiring veterinarians to implement it puts the costs through the roof for small animals. Further in the case of rabbits, poultry and other small animals tags are not possible. Rabbits have tattoos in the ear but a tag detracts from the ability to show which would put a serious dent if not halt the breeding and exhibition of purebred rabbits, some which are in existance because of shows. It can be a death blow to the rare livestock which are already small in numbers.
Poultry cannot safely be tagged. It's said that some poultry and small livestock could be microchipped, with some reports that microchipping pets has a higher rate of cancer. So if I microchip each of 50 chickens (even if it was affordable) and that microchip is a source of contamintion it is not the public affected - those birds are for my freezer. If a litter of bunnies has 10 at birth but only 7 make it to weaning it becomes a nightmare to report it for those with even a small rabbitry of 20 does.
These are not commercial enterprises. The risk to the public health is zero - whether NAIS is in place or not because I am not selling. NAIS is intrustive and unfairly implemented. We can already trace animals - if and when I sign up to purchase anything at a sale barn drivers license info is taken - thus if there was a massive outbreak involving animals from the sale the sale barn already knows who bought what and where it went based on existing records.
Small producers do not eye the export market - no chance of contaminating other countries there. The large corporations who do get a pass on tagging and the standards small producers must meet.
Additionally it violates the right to privacy and the constitutional right to search and seizure. It allows unfair harassment of small farmers by the competition - large corporate places that have a place in volume production but not necessarily in the quality. The narrow genetic base of many large herds leave those more open to problems but with fewer restrictions. Additionally with the growing harassment from animal rights groups and the insecurity of information within the government it leaves an opening for harassment and even arson, assault and vandalism of private property that the governent cannot prevent and will not protect from. There is no reason the government needs to know how many rabbits or ducks or whatever someone has.
Much disease is spread through migration - which is not something livestck do. The "governments herds" of deer, elk and other animals are also exempt from legislation requirements. This is a point of possible contamination due to movement that is much more at risk than animals confined to one place.
The forced sign up in some states such as IL where one HAS to sign up in order to show at the county or state fair is a tactic that does nothing to assure that this is anything but what is presented - the government forcing their way into our homes and farms.
Many of our US livestock breeds are endangered, with under 1,000 left. This would mean extinction for them - animals that may well be needed desperately if outbreaks or problems happen in the commercial places. On one hand there's laws to eliminate large farms (such as the cage ban in CA) but on the other there's NAIS pushing to eliminate the alternative. A taste test by chefs and experts showed overwhelmingly the rare breeds were favored above the commercial breeds in turkeys, beef and pork. Those behind NAIS and the USDA want to throw that out and force what some see as inferior food to begin with by eliminating the ability to do anything else.
The vast majority of people are against this, have been against it and still things are slipped in and the USDA is going ahead while pretending to listen. There is no excuse for ignoring those involved. The only ones I've heard speak in favor of it are those who stand to profit from it. By reducing competition we have no choice in our then weakened and compromised food supply. By requiring this it puts billions of dollars in the hands of corporations selling tags and readers and TAKES it from the small rural places already hit by the economy and the people raising their own food BECAUSE of the economy.
Are these a public health risk worth eliminating? Neither of these will be found in commercial herds - the cow has horns and the chicken is not a commercial white bird.
Chatboard (0)